彩合网app下载 - 彩合官网平台

来源：彩合网开户2021-02-04 17:48

彩合网app下载

立春，一起向未来******

　　作者：刘文嘉

　　天上春来谁报人，江山气象一时新。

　　第二十四届冬季奥林匹克运动会2月4日晚在北京开幕，恰逢中国的立春节气。此刻，不知有多少团聚的家庭围炉夜话，不知有多少重逢的朋友畅叙别情。划破夜空的奥运焰火、令人惊叹的开幕盛况，又将给多少人留下终生难忘的“年味”？

　　我们听到了中国与世界的文化共鸣。

　　2008年北京奥运会开幕式上，舞蹈绘出的水墨长卷、千人击缶的壮观场景，曾让世界惊叹中国文化的风采独具；此刻，简约、安全、精彩的北京冬奥会开幕式，传递出构建人类命运共同体的强烈信念，又让世界看到了中国文化的开放包容。当奥林匹克遇上中国年，当开幕式倒计时仪式遇上二十四节气，当“希腊三圣”的哲学遇上孔孟老庄的智慧，人们惊讶地发现，这二者之间竟能产生如此强烈的共鸣。立春中的冬奥会开幕式，不就是一幅“美美与共”的图景吗？

　　我们看到了传统与现代的水乳交融。

　　一朵雪花，从1924年的法国夏蒙尼飘到2022年的中国北京，穿起了近百年冬奥会历史；不同年代的竞技镜头，由黑白影像变换为3D场景，折射出人类现代化历程—北京冬奥会开幕式及其先导片传递出了强烈的“由历史向未来”的观感。它不再是一场一般意义上的大型文艺表演，而是以科技的力量、创新的方法，创造出丰富的观看体验、饱满的艺术效果，最终将中国梦与世界梦交汇在一起。它向我们提供了这样的启示：具有深厚历史与文化自信的民族，也一定奔涌着创新、开放的活力！

　　我们感受到了竞技体育与经济社会的此呼彼应。

　　新冠肺炎疫情之下，世界普遍呼唤奥林匹克盛会的到来，因为后者代表着克难攻坚的精神、寄托着同舟共济的热望、凝聚着命运与共的信念。而推动经济全球化深入发展，让和平、发展、合作、共赢的时代潮流更加强劲，一直是中国奉行的政策，更是中国务实的行动。的确，奥林匹克精神主张超越政治分歧、种族隔阂、文化差异，面向未来凝聚起人类的力量，这不就是人类命运共同体理念的精髓吗？“更快”“更高”“更强”最终是为了“更团结”，这不正是倡导天下大同、民胞物与的中国文化的主张吗？

　　在中国，立春，为二十四节气之首。立，是“开始”“发端”之意；春，代表万物复苏、草木萌发，意味着新的四时轮回已开启。立春中拉开大幕的冬奥盛会，是一种象征，也饱含着期待：冰雪运动日新月异、奥林匹克运动蒸蒸日上、中国华章日新、世界未来可期。一起向未来，就让我们从立春之日出发！

　　《光明日报》( 2022年02月05日 05版)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.